Update: Occupiers Protest Cobb Foreclosures
The courthouse rally started late, then lasted about an hour Tuesday.
Updated 9:30 p.m.
The first Occupiers arrived at the Cobb County Superior Court building around noon Tuesday despite the plan to start the protest at 10 a.m., and they stayed until 1 p.m.
"It went well," Richard Pellegrino said. "There were about 10 of us there, and we made contact with a couple of families that want us to help. I think we got our message across."
Occupiers chanted in front of the courthouse for several minutes, but police moved them to the sidewalk, Pellegrino said.
"The movement has been growing," he said. "As it has moved out to the suburbs, it's drawn participants there. It's a topic that resonates with everyone, whether they agree with Occupy or not."
Occupiers also gathered at foreclosure auctions in DeKalb, Fulton and Gwinnett counties Tuesday.
Protesters plan to continue attending Cobb County's foreclosure auctions, which take place the first Tuesday of every month.
Original Report
The Occupy movement, which began in New York with Occupy Wall Street and reached Atlanta over the summer, has spread to Cobb County.
Today, Occupy Cobb holds its first demonstration, "Occupy the Foreclosure Auctions," from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the Cobb County Superior Courthouse in Marietta to protest foreclosure auction.
On the first Tuesday of each month, thousands of foreclosed homes are auctioned off throughout Georgia. According to RealtyTrac, a company that tracks foreclosures, auctions and bank-owned homes, an estimated 1.4 million U.S. homes are in a foreclosure process.
Occupy Cobb, along with Occupy Atlanta, has joined a national call for an immediate moratorium on foreclosures.
The call, Occupy Our Homes, first went out when Monique White of Minneapolis requested an occupation of her home after she learned of its foreclosure. Learn more in a short film telling White's story.
What do you think of the Occupy movement? Is Occupy Our Homes a move in the right direction?
"This monthly action is designed to bring attention to the foreclosure crisis through a noisy disruption of 'business as usual' on the court steps in Fulton, Cobb, Gwinnett and DeKalb counties," Occupy Atlanta said in a statement. "Bring drums, whistles, pots and pans, bells and other noise-makers."
This Occupy Our Homes movement began in more than two dozen cities, including Atlanta, in late November and early December. Occupy protesters have rallied at the county courthouse steps in DeKalb, Gwinnett and Fulton counties.
"We're using our voices, whistles and other noise. The auctioneers don't know what to do, and some of the buyers left," Tim Franzen, an Occupy Atlanta spokesman, told CNN.
Occupy Atlanta's focus on foreclosures has resulted in victories.
Beginning Dec. 6, protesters occupied the home of Brigitte Walker, an Iraq War veteran. After a week, the Occupiers helped save it from foreclosure. Lender JPMorgan Chase offered a loan modification that will save Walker hundreds a month, she told The Huffington Post.
A flier from Occupy Atlanta's website about today's event reads: "These are people's homes, taken from them illegally, often immorally. Join with us to stop this tragedy."
Charles Klughart
8:17 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
I hope the police will be there to arrest them as they would any person who disturbs a legal government event.
If trhey want to help, let them buy the property and let the people live free.
Cobbmom
9:05 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
It would be nicer if the police arrested the bank officials who forge signatures and illegally foreclose on people's houses. Bank of America has done this thousands of times in numerous states but no one has taken action against them. I say kudos to the Occupy people for bringing attention to the banking and Wall Street corruption.
The Voice of Reason
8:57 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Listen My Fellow Americans,
I hope this woman makes a full recovery BUT Americans must live within their means. Not everyone can own a home. That is why there are apartments. When going to college, students should make wise deceisions about majors that will lead to jobs. If you major in the humanities these days don't ask for your loans to be forgiven. If you are in the armed forces, use the GI bill to get job training or an education. Don't lease cars, buy inexpensive ones and run them until they can no longer function. Buy a house within your means and stop keeping up with the Jones'.
Cobbmom
9:09 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
You should add that people shouldn't work for corporations that pay their CEO's millions of dollars while laying off thousands of employees. How dare a "common" person feel that they can buy a home when their job hangs by a thread every day. My husband and I bought a house well within our means but when the company he worked for filed bankruptcy he was laid off and we lost our income overnight. The finance company refused to work with us to negotiate a lower monthly payment.
Audrey Nelson
12:13 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Voice of Reason - Can't believe how totally out of touch you are with reality. People are NOT losing their homes because they overspent or did not live within their means. They are losing their homes because they are losing their jobs and their homes have depreciated in value by hundreds of thousands of dollars making it impossible to sell - or their salaries have been cut by 50% - or the company they worked for declared bankruptcy and went out of business and they lost their health insurance and now have medical bills - and people with masters degrees are now making minimum wage at fast food restaurants because no one else will hire them. In Chicago 60,000 teachers applied for less than 2,000 jobs. What about those that have to support their parents or relatives because their medicare is so small and they have gone thru their life savings - or their husband has died - like me - and I still have 3 children at home but only one income - and there is no social security for widows if you make over $14,000. You are either very young and naive or don't know much about what is happening in this country.
Pam J
9:23 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
I really hate this whole process of selling homes on the courthouse steps. I know it's the way it's done, but it's very humilating to the people whose houses have been foreclosed on. With that being said, there are a lot of legitimately foreclosed homes out there. Mine is one of them. It will be sold next month unless I come up with a miracle. I do not blame the mortgage company, because I have not made a payment since last August. They have tried to work with me, but I don't have a job and I have no job prospects. My brother (who I moved in with) lost his job back in June, and he was threatened with foreclosure. But Suntrust worked with him and he got a forebearance and a loan modification. Now he's making money, so at least we can stay. I think that most of the people on the foreclosure list just walked away from their homes. If you don't have a way to make any payment, and pay your utilities, why stay? It's sad, but that's the economy right now.
Rich "The Equalizer" Pellegrino
9:46 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
I agree with elements of what everyone has said as it is a complicated issue--like most issues. I also am in full support of and a participant in the Occupy movement both locally and around the country (and will be there today) for a number of reasons but the main being that it is largely young people taking control of their lives, government, economy and reexamining all of our long-held assumptions, many of which have gotten us in this mess--a true populist, grass roots movement. Occupy our Homes has already, in Atlanta, saved the home of an Iraqi war veteran and a 100 yr old lady. The fact is, if people stand up for their rights and negotiate with the banks then they will be forced to negotiate. Another fact is that the majority of mortgages written in that period of late 90's and early 200's are fraudulent and they know it so they will negotiate rather than go to court and be confronted with that proof. This is really "power to the people" and we are reaching out to the Tea Party and all people who want to take back control of their government and economy--which means taking back control of the corporations who have bought them.
Melinda Paris
10:09 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
I don't think protesting at the courthouse is productive at all. People, if you can't afford a house or if you loose your job, why should you get to keep living there, while the rest of us is paying our payments? what is so right about that? They have been auctioning off houses of this sort for years, and years....People want to blame corporations, it goes much deeper than that, President Clinton basically put the screws on the banks if they didn't hand out loans, and the nutcase Barney Frank, so there is alot of people to blame, but what about yourselves?? If you know you shouldn't be buying a house, then why did you all sign the papers?? Most of the houses in foreclosures is from people who should have been renting and were in over their heads from DAY ONE!...I know this, cause I know alot of these people and they even admit, that they should have been more resourceful and should have rented or leased a while longer, they were not ready for the responsiblities that come with owning a home...Alot of the corporate people began with nothing and worked 80-90 hour weeks to get to where they are, and then people that don't put in long hours want what they have...Do it the old fashion way, save and buy when you have the money and quit wanting a hand out..
Pam J
10:49 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
I think that in the beginning of the housing meltdown, a couple of years ago, the houses that were being foreclosed on were because people did buy more house than they could afford, on an adjustable rate mortgage. The banks and mortgage companies raised the rates and people couldn't afford their payments. I blame that on the person who bought the house. Even though the banks were being "pressured" to approve loans, nobody held a gun to those peoples heads and forced them to sign. Now, I think that most of the foreclosures today are due to people who are in the same situation as me. They've lost their jobs. We have record unemployment right now and that translates into people losing their homes. It doesn't matter how big or little your mortgage payment is. If you don't have any income, you can't afford it.
Rich "The Equalizer" Pellegrino
1:29 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Hi Melina, as I said it is almost never so cut and dry as you put it...all they are asking is some relief while they get back on their feet like a loan modification which is done all the time but not until someone fights to get it. The fact is, everyone is hurting except the banks, making record profits after being bailed out, while others are asked to live within their means. Each case is different, like the Iraqi war veteran, the policeman, and the 100 yr old lady we already helped. We get contacted all the time by people who are hard working, trying to ilve within their means, and just need a little time--almost everyone finds themselves in that situation at some time.
Melinda Paris
10:11 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
How can people tell others to quit their jobs if their CEO is making millions? So that is what you would do?? Just up and quit, if you have NO CONTROL over your CEO's salary, and you need a job, you don't just quit in this economy, are you kidding me? I don't agree with some of the big salaries or BONUSES, But, I can't just quit my job cause I'm mad about it, that's crazy!
Cobbmom
7:14 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Melinda it is difficult to detect sarcasm in a written statement. When I wrote that people shouldn't work for companies paying CEO's millions while laying off workers I was using sarcasm. My husband was abruptly laid off when the company he worked for declared bankruptcy out of the blue. We lost our house but the CEO walked away with a hefty payout and a multi-million dollar home. We continue to struggle while the CEO who drove the company into the ground has comfortably retired.
Melinda Paris
11:02 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Based on what I see on the news, most of the "occupy" people are not home owners, alot of them are students, so really they are protesting about something that the majority know nothing about.
Amy
11:18 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Here, here! They probably have their parents paying for college too. Not that I would otherwise be at the protest, but I have to go to work and don't have time for luxuries like hanging out all day banging pots and pans.
Rich "The Equalizer" Pellegrino
1:31 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
They are protesting because they are inheriting a mess which our generation caused...and the fact that it may not directly affect them now makes their efforts even more laudable. And their protests are having profound effects on the whole system which is now in the spotlight. Again, I applaud their sacrifices which they are making on behalf of all of us.
Marietta Scott
1:38 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012
I own 2 homes, my own business employing many local citizens and work for a national company. The crime is lazy American citizens who refuse to educate themselves about the Corporate Fraud that has been perpetuated on our country. Citizens are losing their jobs, their homes and their retirements due to Corporations who took advantage of our financial system. They ADVISED Americans that they could afford the loans they offered (not everyone has an MBA and why are we paying them fees if they aren't 'the Experts'), bundled bad loans and sold them as AAA then took out insurance on them knowing they would fail. As a result hard-working Americans who did all the right things in our culture were swindled. Good business, who did nothing wrong, have gone out of business. Lazy are those who still have their jobs, their homes and do nothing to help their fellow citizens. Ignorance is fed by those who get their news from Corporate Media outlets like FoxNews who perpetuate the problem.
Amy
11:18 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Also, I'm so glad that my tax money will be spent on the policemen that will need to be there because of their demonstration. (sarcasm)
Rich "The Equalizer" Pellegrino
1:32 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
They are helping those very policemen who are largely underpaid to keep their homes.
And I took off my lunch hour to support them...it doesn't take much to help but it is always easier to criticize.
Mit
11:29 am on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Pam - I hope things work out for you and family in 2012.
Pam J
12:54 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Thank you, Mit, I hope so too.
Neal Dow
12:07 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
Jeff A. Taylor
1:07 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
The Occupy movement is so close to getting to the real issue: How gov't at all levels conspired with the banksters to defraud the public at large.
The liar loans helped -- and sadly CONTINUE TO HELP -- artificially inflate property values, which in turn gins up local government property tax revenue. That is why the officials who SHOULD be leading the charge for reform are local deed and property officials, but it is not in their indirect financial interest to do so. More broadly, several trillion dollars in fake wealth floated a fake US economy for more than a decade. This is why crawling out of the crater is proving so very difficult.
All we have been doing the past 3 yrs. is trying to re-inflate the real estate bubble while denying the reality of the problem. Properly understood then, foreclosures are the least disruptive of all the possible reactions to the fraud. They maintain the illusion of value for as long as possible while not requiring the banks to admit the titles they are holding are worth a fraction of what is on their books.
Until some brave, moral US Atty gets tired of chasing Sudafed around the countryside and starts a RICO investigation of the GSEs, the TBTF banks, and ALL govt officials who conspired to benefit from the fraud we'll continue to see the foreclosure can kicked down the road.
Pam J
7:28 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
"we'll continue to see the foreclosure can kicked down the road.
Jeff, don't you think the foreclosures now are a direct result of people losing their jobs? It's got nothing to do with inflated or deflated values. It's as simple as no income, no house. I know four people who have lost their homes because they lost their jobs. I'm about to lose mine. Actually, the mortgage company has had the locks changed on the house, so I guess I've already lost it. I would be willing to bet that at least 3/4's of the homes in foreclosure now are due to job loss.
C.J.
6:32 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Let's remember what caused the economic mess that we're still trying to recover from. Loan originators (i.e., banks and mortgage companies) KNOWINGLY made extremely risky loans or obviously bad loans because they knew they could sell 100 percent of the risk to the investment houses that would turn around and sell them to investors in the form of mortgage-backed securities (which they paid ratings firms to rate highly, despite the fact that they were junk). These banks didn't care if the mortgages were paid because they were in it for the loan origination and servicing fees. The investment houses didn't care if the mortgages were safe because they were in it for the commissions from the sale of the securities. And given their influence in Washington, many were well aware that the government would likely step in to protect those primarily responsible from the downside to their ponzi schemes (prosecution and jail time, for example).
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/13/business/la-fi-wamu-inquiry13-2010apr13
Cobbmom
7:14 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
I completely agree with you Chris. We were pre-approved for a loan, bought a house less than our approved amount but found out at closing that we had a balloon payment at the end that nearly equaled the purchase price of the home. Nothing was ever said about a balloon payment, the movers were on the way with all our belongings when we found out. A little late to not sign the papers. I wonder how many other people were caught in these "deals"?
C.J.
6:36 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
If you don't want to click on the link above, here's an excerpt (note that Washington Mutual was just the tip of the iceberg)...
"It's hard to say which lender went berserk first," Muolo said, as the subprime rivals wound up adopting the philosophy "If he or she breathes, we will make the loan."...
The company and its Long Beach unit "used shoddy lending practices . . . to make tens of thousands of high-risk home loans that too often contained excessive risk, fraudulent information or errors," according to a subcommittee memo...
Adding to the problems, WaMu and Long Beach Mortgage frequently steered borrowers who qualified for prime loans into subprime loans, the subcommittee found. WaMu then spread the risk of those loans and riskier ones to investors by packaging the subprime loans into $77 billion worth of securities it sold to investors, the panel found.
"At times, WaMu selected and securitized loans that it had identified as likely to go delinquent," the report said.
K. Davis
9:42 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Federal government/Fannie Mae
http://geke.us/FannieMaeVenn.html
K. Davis
9:57 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
The cause of the current financial crisis - derivatives. If you add up the value of every stock the market capitalization would be about $36 trillion. For bonds it's a market capitalization of about $72 trillion. The notional value of the derivative market is roughly $1.4 quadrillion. Derivatives aren't assets. They're just imaginary security of no value that financial institutions trade like a “gentleman’s bet” on the value of future risk or securities. And they are unregulated. And that's why our financial system collapsed and we have Occupy Wall Street.
K. Davis
10:01 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
In 1998 Brooksley Born (a woman) went to the trifecta - Alan Greenspan, Larry Summers, and Bob Rubin - and said derivatives needed to be regulated. Greenspan's response? Nope, not gonna happen. That was 1998. Now with that knowledge criticize Occupy Wall Street.
C.J.
2:54 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Derivatives didn't cause the recession, but they definitely exacerbated it.
Derivatives are also known as credit default swaps or CDSs. They're traded over the counter, so no one knows exactly how much exposure they created, but estimates place the 2007 worldwide value at around $50 trillion.
It was because of its issuance of CDSs that the insurer AIG needed a government bailout. So, the financial panic was not limited to firms that over invested in mortgage-backed securities. It also affected companies that issued CDSs on mortgage-backed securities.
What is a derivative or a a CDS? It's an insurance policy. The seller of a CDS agrees to compensate the buyer in the event of a “credit event,” such as a default on these bonds. In return, the buyer makes premium payments to the seller.
However, unlike most insurance, people could buy a CDS on a mortgage-backed security they don't own. It's as if someone bought fire insurance on his neighbor’s house such that he benefits if the neighbor's house burns down.
Such insurance is structured as “swaps” to evade the regulations governing traditional insurance products. For example, if AIG wanted to sell life insurance to a you, it would have to set aside reserves to make it more likely that AIG could fulfill the policy if you died a week later. On the other hand, if AIG sold you a CDS against a bond default, then such regulations didn't apply.
Again, not the cause, but derivatives made the situation worse.
Smyna Res
9:38 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012
I could agree with that....don't think it is the primary cause, but certainly greased the wheels. You could say that about a lot of things though. alcohol in itself isn't bad, but excessive and poor use of alcohol, combined with a car can be disastrous.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could take a generally (I think we could all agree here) awful situation and just shrug our shoulders, point our fingers and say "it was them!". The problem was these greedy bankers!
I tend to believe the problem rests with the larger population. I don't think its any fun to say we are the problem, so people cast the blame on Wall St., politicians, derivatives, or anything else besides themselves. Just my humble opinion.
Fredda Shutes
8:58 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012
How about an administration which used taxpayers' money to bail out the banks, GM & Chrysler, energy, etc. with no strings attached. The government should have required the banks to put this money back into circulation by making decent loans to the citizenry instead of hiding it overseas or paying big bucks to execs. All of our problems go back to our 14+ trillion dollar debt that we can NEVER pay off. All of us are going to be in the same boat in a third world country before it is over with.